Clarify The Difference Between Noun And Passive Verb

Transcribe writing in this image [Image]

[Insert your own writing sample] "Analyze the writing style of the above author and write about [Add topic] in a similar way."

Can you read this? [Image]

I want you to act as a prompt generator. Firstly, I will give you a title like this: "Act as an English Pronunciation Helper". Then you give me a prompt like this: "I want you to act as an English pronunciation assistant for Turkish speaking people. I will write your sentences, and you will only answer their pronunciations, and nothing else. The replies must not be translations of my sentences but only pronunciations. Pronunciations should use Turkish Latin letters for phonetics. Do not write explanations on replies. My first sentence is "how the weather is in Istanbul?"." (You should adapt the sample prompt according to the title I gave. The prompt should be self-explanatory and appropriate to the title, don't refer to the example I gave you.). My first title is "Act as a Code Review Helper" (Give me prompt only)

I want you to act as an English pronunciation assistant for Turkish speaking people. I will write you sentences and you will only answer their pronunciations, and nothing else. The replies must not be translations of my sentence but only pronunciations. Pronunciations should use Turkish Latin letters for phonetics. Do not write explanations on replies. My first sentence is "how the weather is in Istanbul?"

Here's a passage from an essay. Your job is to guess which author it sounds like: "If you asked people what was special about Einstein, most would say that he was really smart. Even the ones who tried to give you a more sophisticated-sounding answer would probably think this first. Till a few years ago I would have given the same answer myself. But that wasn't what was special about Einstein. What was special about him was that he had important new ideas. Being very smart was a necessary precondition for having those ideas, but the two are not identical."

Please explain the following passage in simple words. I am having difficulty understanding the idea of Messianic time. "Historicism contents itself with establishing a causal connection between various moments in history. But no fact that is a cause is for that very reason historical. It became historical posthumously, as it were, though events that may be separated from it by thousands of years. A historian who takes this as his point of departure stops telling the sequence of events like the beads of a rosary. Instead, he grasps the constellation which his own era has formed witha definite earlier one. Thus he establishes a conception of the present as the 'time of the now' which is shot through with chips of Messianic time."

I’ll write sentences for you, and I want you to check them for plagiarism. You only reply “plagiarized” or “ not plagiarized” depending on whether the sentence is or is not plagiarized. Don’t write explanations.

Please critique the following passage and let me know if my argument is clear enough or not As long as the study ofliterature is organized along national lines, we cannot decenter global literary history. Merely shifting our focus from major/core literatures to minor/peripheral ones does not decenter anything for such a move preserves the centrality of nation as the only kind of community in which a literary work can become legible. This article argues against a national teleology of literature in which we project the category of nation back in historical time and propose to look instead at literary history in terms of genre communities-communities that commune around a literary genre (e.g. a novel community. ghazal community). With the help of a nineteenth-century Urdu novel, Nazir Ahmad's Mirat ul-"Urus (IIOI) (The Bride's Mirron), I show how a national teleology that gets imposed retrospectively has led scholars of Urdu literature to assume that the novel gives expression to the concerns of reforming a Muslim nation. However, what emerges in and through Nazir Ahmad's novel is not a Muslim nation but a novel community of the ashraf (singular sharif; literally, exalted, noble, honorable). This novel community is organized around the economy of sharaf (hono) and not Islam.